Appositive Semantic Classification in Sumerian Cuneiform and the Implementation of iClassifier
Keywords:
Sumerian, CuneiformAbstract
Sumerian, an agglutinative language of unknown affiliation, surfaced in mankind’s earliest written sources around 3300 BCE. It continued to play a salient role in the transmission of cuneiform cultures for more than three millennia, even after its disappearance as a vernacular (around 2000 BCE). From its beginnings, semantic classification played an important role in this initially pre-dominantly semasiographic-ideographic script. Here, such classifications are contrasted with and compared to the normalized ‘consolidated’ standard set of pre- and post-nominal classifiers – generally known as ‘determinatives’ – which function chiefly as sortal classifiers. It is further suggested here that the relationship between classifying nouns and classified nouns is best described in terms of nominal apposition. This paper further demonstrates how the relevant information was entered into the iClassifier system, specially designed for such comparisons in order to improve our understanding of how cuneiform classifiers mark their referents and to make them comparable with similar features in other scripts and languages. We will then briefly survey how the answers to queries in the iClassifier database may illuminate “the diverse mindsets of ancient Mesopotamia”.
References
D’Anna, M. B., C. Jauß and C. J. Johnson 2016. Food and Urbanization: Material and Textual Perspectives on Alimentary Practice in Early Mesopotamia, Introduction. Origini: Rivista di Preistoria e Protostoria della Civiltà Antiche 37: 8–14.
Attinger, P. 2021. Glossaire sumérien-français principalement des textes littéraires paléobabyloniens. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Bauer, B. L. M. 2017. Nominal Apposition in Indo-European. Boston /Berlin: De Gruyter.
Boltz, W. 1994. The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System. New Haven: American Oriental Society.
Borger, R. 1978. Assyrisch-Babylonische Zeichenliste. Kevelaer: Neukirchen & Vluyn.
Civil, M. 2004. The Series DIRI = (w)atrum. Material for the Sumerian Dictionary XV. Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.
Civil, M. 2008. The Early Dynastic Practical Vocabulary A (Archaic HAR –ra A) Archivi Reali di Ebla Studi IV. Roma: Missione Archeologica Italiana in Siria.
Civil, M. 2010. The Lexical Texts in the Schoeyen Collection. Bethesda (MA): CDL.
Cooper, J. S. 2004. Babylonian Beginnings: The Origin of the Cuneiform Writing System in Comparative Perspective, in S. Houston (ed) The First Writing. Script Invention as History and Process: 71–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deimel, A. 1924. Šumerische Grammatik der archaistischen Texte. Orientalia 9-13- Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.
Edzard, D. O. 2003. Sumerian Grammar. Leiden: Brill.
Ellermeier, F. 1979. Sumerisches Glossar. Band 1, Teil 1. Nürten-Hardenberg bei Göttingen:
Selbstverlag.
Englund, R. K. 2009. The Smell of the Cage. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2009/4: 1–27.
Falkenstein, A. 1936. Archaische Texte aus Uruk. Berlin /Leipzig: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Kommissionsverlag O. Harrassowitz.
Falkenstein, A. 1949. Grammatik der Sprache Gudeas von Lagaš I. Schrift- und Formenlehre. Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.
Falkenstein, A. 1964. Das Sumerische. Handbuch der Orientalistik. Der Nahe und der Mittlere Osten. Zweiter Band: Keilschriftforschung und Alte Geschichte Vorderasiens. Leiden: Brill.
Farber, G. 1991. Konkret, Kollektiv, Abstrakt? Aula Orientalis 9 (Festschrift M. Civil): 81-90.
Foxvog, Daniel A. 2016. Introduction to Sumerian Grammar. Internet Publication. (Cuneiform Digital Library Preprints http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlp/cdlp0002_20160104.pdf [accessed 10.2016]).
Gadd, C. J. 1924. A Sumerian Reading-Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gelb, I. J. 1963 (1952). A Study of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldwasser, O. 2003. The Building Block of a Cenceptual Catergory, in L. Morra and C. Bazzanella (eds.) Philosophers and Hieroglyphs: 219-236. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
Goldwasser, O. 2006. A comparison between classifier languages and classifier scripts: the case of ancient Egyptian, in G. Goldenberg and A. Shisha-Halevy (eds.) Egyptian, Semitic and General Grammar: 16-39. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.
Goldwasser, O., and C. Grinevald 2012. What Are Determinatives Good for? in S. Polis, E. Grossman and J. Winand (eds.) Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian: 17–53. Hamburg: Widmaier.
Green, M. W. and H. J. Nissen 1987. Zeichenliste der archaischen Texte aus Uruk. Berlin : Gebr. Mann.
Grinevald, C. 2012. Basics on Classifier Systems, appendix to What are ‘Determinatives’ good for? in S. Polis, E. Grossman and J. Winand (eds.) Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian: 46-53. Hamburg: Widmaier.
Grinevald, C. 2015. Classifiers, Linguistics of, in J. D. Wright (ed), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition Vol 3: 811–818. Oxford: Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/referenceworks/9780080430768
Hackstein, O. 2010. Apposition and Nominal Classification in Indo-European and Beyond. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Handel, Z. 2016. Does Xǔ Shèn’s Huìyì Category Reflect Historical Reality? An Argument for the Existence of Compound Graphs Lacking Phonophorics, in P.-H. Ting, S. H.-N. Cheung, S.-W. Tang and A. Chin (eds.) New Horizons in the Study of Chinese: Dialectology, Grammar, and Philology. Studies in Honor of Professor Anne Yue: 581-598. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. [漢語研究的新貌：方言、語法與文獻，2016，581-598:香港中文大學中國文化研究吳多泰中國語文研究中心].
Handel, Z. 2019. Sinography. The Borrowing and Adaptation of the Chinese Script. Leiden/ Boston: Brill.
Harel, H., O. Goldwasser and D. Nikolaev (in press). Mapping the Ancient Mind: iClassifier, a New Platform for Systematic Analysis of Classifiers in Egyptian and Beyond, in J. A. Roberson, R. Lucarelli, S. Vinson (eds.). Ancient Egypt and New Technology: The Present and Future of Computer Visualization, Virtual Reality and other Digital Humanities in Egyptology. 29-30 March 2019 at Indiana University, Bloomington. Leiden.
Hincks, E. 1846a. On the First and Second Kinds of Persepolitan Writing. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 21: 114-131.
Hincks, E. 1846b. On the Three Kinds of Persepolitan Writing and On the Babylonian Lapidary Characters. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 21: 233-241.
Hincks, E. 1846c. On the Third Persepolitan Writing, and on the Mode of Expressing Numerals in Cuneatic Characters. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 21: 249-256.
Hincks, E. 1847. On the Inscriptions at Van. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 9: 387-449.
Houston, S. (ed) 2004. The First Writing. Script Invention as History and Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huehnergard, J. 1996 (21998). A Grammar of Akkadian. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
Jagersma, B. 2010. A Descriptive Grammar of Sumerian. Leiden: Scholarly Publications Leiden University.
Johnson, C. J. 2019. Meat Distribution in Late Uruk Diacritical Feasts: Second-Order Bookkeeping Techniques and their Institutional Context in Late Fourth Millennium BCE Mesopotamia, in J. Renn and M. Schemmel (eds.) Culture and Cognition: Essays in Honor of Peter Damerow. (Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge, Proceedings 11): 75-86. Berlin: Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.
Keetman, J. 2020. Sumerisch auf Tafeln der Schriftstufe Uruk III, in I. Arkhipov, L. Kogan, N. Koslova (eds.) The Third Millennium. Studies in Early Mesopotamia and Syria in Honor of Walter Sommerfeld and Manfred Krebernik (Cuneiform Monographs 50): 34-376. Leiden: Brill.
Krebernik, M. 2002. Zur Struktur und Geschichte des ältesten sumerischen Onomastikons, in M. P. Streck and S. Weninger (eds.) Altorientalische und semitische Onomastik. (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 296): 1-74. Münster: Ugarit.
Krebernik, M. 2007. Zur Entwicklung des Sprachbewusstseins im Alten Orient, in C. Wilcke (ed) Das geistige Erfassen der Welt im Alten Orient: 39-61. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Krebernik, M. 2013. Die frühe Keilschrift und ihr Verhältnis zur Sprache, in N. Crüsemann, M. van Ess, B. Salje and M. Hilgert (eds.) Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity Begleitband zur Ausstellung „Uruk-5000 Jahre Megacity“ im Pergamonmuseum-Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, in den Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen Mannheim: 187-193. Petersberg Allemagne : Michael Imhof Verlag. [engl. edition 2019: 167-173].
Labat, R. 19886 (1948). Manuel d’epigraphie Akkadienne. Paris: P. Geuthner.
Michalowski, P. 1993. Tokenism. American Anthropologist 95: 996-999.
Nissen, H. J., P. Damerow and R. K. Englund 1993. Archaic bookkeeping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; [engl. edition of H. J. Nissen, P. Damerow and R. K. Englund Frühe Schrift und Techniken der Wirtschaftsverwaltung im Alten Orient. Bad Salzdetfurth: Franzbecker].
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1992. Before writing. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1996. How writing came about. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Selz, G. J. 2018a. Scriptura Franca? Zur Rolle einer ideographisch basierten Schrift in einer mehrsprachigen Gesellschaft, in S. Fink, M. Lang and M. Schretter (eds.) Mehrsprachigkeit. Vom Alten Orient bis zum Esperanto (Dubsar 2): 113-127. Münster: Zaphon.
Selz, G. J. 2018b. A Mesopotamian path to abstraction? On Sumerian ‘ontologies’, in R. Rollinger (ed) Conceptualizing Past, Present and Future (Melammu Symposia 9): 409-433. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.
Selz, G. J. 2020a. The Uruk Phenomenon, in K. Radner, N. Moeller and D. T. Potts (eds.) The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East Volume 1. From the Beginnings to Old Kingdom Egypt and the Dynasty of Akkad: 163-244. New York: Oxford University Press.
Selz, G. J. 2020b. Sumerian compound nouns, typological considerations, in M. C. Benvenuto et al. (eds.) Word Formation, Grammar and Lexicology. Contrastive, Multilingual and Comparative-Historical Perspectives (Indogermanische Textlinguistik, Poetik und Stilistik 4): 319-347. Hamburg: Baar Verlag.
Selz, G. J. 2021. The puzzling Logogram: writing and reasoning in Early Mesopotamia, in G. Gabriel, K. Overmann and A. Payne (eds.) Signs – Sounds – Semantics. Nature and Transformation of Writing Systems in the Ancient Near East. (Wiener Offene Orientalisitk 13): 27-47. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.
Selz, G. J. (in press a) [2015]). The World Behind the Words. Reflections on Concepts Crossing Linguistic Boundaries; Reflections on Concepts Crossing Linguistic Boundaries. Pre-print [2015] at academia.edu.
Selz, G. J. (in press b). Beyond Speech. Advocating a non-logocentric view on the evolution of Cuneiform writing, in D. Wengrow (ed) Image Thought, and the Making of Social Worlds (Freiburger Studien zur Archäologie & Visuellen Kultur 3). Heidelberg: Propylaeum.
Selz, G. J. (in preparation). How meaning evolves – the case of zabar ‘bronze’.
Selz, G. J., O. Goldwasser and C. Grinevald 2018. The Question of Sumerian ‘Determinatives’. Inventory, Classifier Analysis, and Comparison to Egyptian Classifiers from the Linguistic Perspective of Noun Classification. Lingua Aegyptia. Journal of Egyptian Language 25: 281-344.
Schretter, M. 2000. Zu den Nominalkomposita des Sumerischen, in S. Graziani (ed) Studi sul Vicino Oriente Antico dedicati alla memoria di Luigi Cagni. Vol. 2. (Istituto Universitario Orientale. Dipartimento di Studi Asiatici. Series minor 61): 933–952. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale.
Veldhuis, N. 2006. How did they learn cuneiform?, in P. Michalowski and N. Veldhuis (eds.) Approaches to Sumerian Literature: Studies in Honour of Stip (H. L. J. Vanstiphout): 181-200. Leiden: Brill.
Veldhuis. N. 2014. History of the Cuneiform Lexical Tradition. Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record, Vol. 6. München: Ugarit-Verlag.
Wagensonner, K. 2009. Non-Textuality in the Ancient Near East: Some Glimpses from the Mesopotamian Field, in P. Andrássy, J. Budka and F. Kammerzell (eds.), Non-Textual Marking Systems, Writing and Pseudo-Script from Prehistory to Modern Times: 33-67. Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
Wagensonner, K. 2010. Early Lexical Lists Revisited: Structures and classification as a mnemonic device, in L. Kogan (ed) Language in the Ancient Near East: 285-310. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.
Wagensonner, K. 2016. Die frühen lexikalischen Texte und ihr Aufbau: zu den Archaischen und frühdynastischen Wortlisten, der Anordnung ihrer Einträge und den Klassifikationssystemen in den frühen Phasen der Keilschrift. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.
Wagensonner, K. 2021. Classifiers between Euphrates and Tigris. On development and use of noun categorization in Cuneiform Script, in G. Gabriel, K. Overmann, A. Payne (eds.) Signs – Sounds – Semantics. Nature and Transformation of Writing Systems in the Ancient Near East (Wiener Offene Orientalisitk 13): 171-212. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.
Woods, C. (ed) 2010. Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond (Oriental Institute Publication 32). Chicago: The Oriental Institute.
ZATU see = M. W. Green & H. J. Nissen 1987
