Editorial: Practices, Representations and Meanings of Human Mobility in Archaeology


  • Maja Gori
  • Martina Revello Lami
  • Alessandro Pintucci




Mobility, Migration, Trade, Colonialism, Identity


Every society experiences movement. As a structural component of human behavior and human mind, movement necessarily influences our ways of thinking, our relationship with people, space, time, and traditions; it modifies how we organize as groups, our perception of things and the way in which we interact with them. For its role in shaping societies, mobility has been at the core of archaeology since its inception as a discipline. Throughout archaeology’s history, key topics focusing on the movement of people have included, among others: migration and diffusion; identity; invasion, conquest, and imperial imposition; colonialism; trade and the movement of goods, people, and animals; seafaring and its associated technologies; resource acquiring practices; nomadism. However, especially following the processual turn, scholars tended to minimize the impact of movement on human history placing instead major emphasis on theories about culture and its inherent mutability (e.g. Trigger 1989, Anthony 1990). As a result, despite decades of research into the nature of mobility by anthropologists, sociologists and geographers along with the most recent and sometimes controversial contributions of hard sciences – mainly strontium (Sr) and oxygen (O) isotope analysis, and aDNA analyses (on aDNA see Vander Linden 2016, Furholt 2018 and the controversial connection between cultural and biological identities in Lazaridis et al. 2017) – much archaeological debate seems still to revolve around two polarizing positions: those using movement as all-in-one explanatory device, and those that downgrade its role as active agent in triggering change.


ANTHONY, D.W., 1990. Migration in Archaeology: The Baby and the Bathwater. American Anthropologist 92: 895–914. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.4.02a00030

ANTHONY, D.W. 1992. The bath refilled: Migration in archaeology again. American Anthropologist 94: 174–176. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1992.94.1.02a00140

ANTHONY, D.W. 1997. Prehistoric migration as social process, in CHAPMAN, J. & H.

HAMEROW (eds.), Migration and Invasion in Archaeological Exlanation, British Archaeological Reports International Series 664. Oxford: Archaeopress: 21-32.

BEAUDRY, M. C. & T. G. PARNO (eds.), 2013. Archaeologies of Mobility and Movement. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6211-8

BURMEISTER, S. 2000. Archaeology and migration. Current Anthropology 41(4): 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1086/317383

CABANA, G. S. & J. J. CLARK (eds.), 2011. Rethinking Anthropological Perspectives on Migration. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813036076.001.0001

CRESSWELL, T., 2006. On the move. Mobility in the modern Western World. Routledge: London, New York.

CRESSWELL, T., 2010. Towards a Politics of Mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407

FURHOLT, M., 2018. Massive Migrations? The Impact of Recent aDNA Studies on our View of Third Millennium Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 21(2): 159–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2017.43

GORI M. & M. REVELLO LAMI, 2018. From Lampedusa to Trieste: tracing forced migrations to understand identity patterns, in DRIESSEN J. (ed.), Archaeology of Forced Migrations, AEGIS 15, Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, 31–53.

HAKENBECK, S., 2008. Migration in archaeology: are we nearly there yet? Archaeological Review from Cambridge 23(2): 9-26.

HAMILAKIS, Y. 2007. From Ethics to Politics, in HAMILAKIS, Y. & P. DUKE (eds.), Archaeology and Capitalism, New York: 15-40.

HAMILAKIS, Y. (ed.), 2016a. Archaeologies of Forced and Undocumented Migration. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 3(2): https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.32409

HAMILAKIS, Y. 2016b. The EU’s Future Ruins: Moria Refugee Camp in Lesbos, visited on December 23 2018, https://www.thenation.com/article/the-eus-future-ruins-moriarefugee- camp-in-lesbos.

HAMILAKIS, Y. (ed.), 2017. The New Nomadic Age: Archaeologies of Forced and Undocumented Migration. Equinox publishing: London. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.32409

LAZARIDIS, I., A. MITTNIK, N. PATTERSON, S. MALLICK, N. ROHLAND, S. PFRENGLE, … G. STAMATOYANNOPOULOS (2017). Genetic origins of the Minoans and Mycenaeans. Nature, 548, 214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23310

OLALDE, I., S. BRACE, M. E. ALLENTOFT, I. ARMIT, K. KRISTIANSEN, T. BOOTH, D. REICH, 2018. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555, 190–196.

VANDER LINDEN M., 2016. Population history in third-millennium BC Europe: assessing the contribution of genetics. World Archaeology 48(5): 714–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2016.1209124

WHATMORE S., 2002. Hybrid Geographies. Natures Cultures Spaces. Sage: London




How to Cite

Gori, M., Revello Lami, M., & Pintucci, A. (2018). Editorial: Practices, Representations and Meanings of Human Mobility in Archaeology. Ex Novo: Journal of Archaeology, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.32028/exnovo.v3i0.377

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.