Queering Serbian Archaeology: Androcentrism, Heteronormativity, Gender and the Writing of (Pre)history

Authors

  • Uroš Matić Institute for Classics, University of Graz

Keywords:

Serbia, Balkans, (Pre)history, Archaeology, Gender, Heteronormativity, Queer

Abstract

In scholarly backroom discussions, archaeologies of the Balkans are often labelled as conservative and ignorant of gender studies, their impact on archaeology, and how it deals with gender in the past. Indeed, androcentrism and heteronormativity are commonly found in archaeological interpretations throughout the Balkans, but not there alone. In this paper I will analyse how gender and sexuality in the past have been approached by some archaeologists in Serbia, a west-central Balkan country, and argue that, although some positive changes can be detected more critical gender and queer archaeologies are direly needed for two reasons. First and foremost, theoretically informed approaches to gender, in contrast to approaches based on gender stereotypes and heteronormativity, can lead to better thought-through and more informed reconstructions of the past. I illustrate this with several examples from mortuary and settlement archaeology. Secondly, and no less importantly, self-reflexive and theoretically informed approaches to gender and sexuality should have an activist component, helping to build a more just and democratic society. Therefore, we are never really done with gender archaeology. The latter is particularly needed in the Balkans, including Serbia, where there is an ongoing struggle against patriarchal ideologies and homophobia. In this respect, a dialogue is needed between archaeologists and the marginalized and oppressed communities and organisations fighting for basic human rights in the region.

References

ANGRAMAINA Accessed 7 Sep 2023 https://www.gay-serbia.com/queer/srejovic-dragoslav/index.jsp

BABIĆ, S. 2004. Poglavarstvo i polis. Starije gvozdeno doba Balkana i grčki svet. Beograd: Balkanološki institut, Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.

BABIĆ, S. 2008. Grci i Drugi. Antička percepcija i percepcija antike. Beograd: Clio.

BABIĆ, S. 2018. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja o prošlosti. Beograd: Clio.

BACK-DANIELSSON, I-M. 2012. Much Ado about Nothing? Gender Research in Journals during. the last 30 years within Archaeology, in: BACK DANIELSSON, I-M. & THEDÉEN, S. (eds.), To Tender Gender. The Pasts and Futures of Gender Research in Archaeology. Stockholm: Stockholm University: 17–32.

BALJ, L. 2017. Dečiji otisci prstiju na predmetima vinčanske kulture. Glasnik srpskog arheološkog društva 33: 149–173.

BATOVIĆ, Š. 1979. Jadranska zona, in: BENAC, A. (ed.), Praistorija jugoslovenskih zemalja II. Neolitsko doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauke i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja: 473–634.

BENAC, A. 1979. Prelazna zona, in: : BENAC, A. (ed.), Praistorija jugoslovenskih zemalja II. Neolitsko doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauke i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja: 363–472.

BOJANIN, S. 2014. Homoseksualnost u srednjovekovnoj Srbiji, in: BLAGOJEVIĆ, J. & DIMITRIJEVIĆ, O. (eds.), Među Nama. Neispričane priče gej i lezbejskih života. Beograd: Hartefakt Fond: 22–39.

BOLGER, D. 2013. Gender, Labour, and Pottery Production in Prehistory, in: BOLGER, D. (ed.), A Companion to Gender Prehistory. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons: 161–179.

CENTAR ZA ŽENSKE STUDIJE ZAGREB KNJIGE 7 Sep 2023

http://zenstud.hr/izdavastvo/knjige/

CHAPMAN, J. & PALINCAȘ, N. 2013. Gender in Eastern European Prehistory, in: BOLGER, D. (ed.), A Companion to Gender Prehistory. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons: 413–437.

COLTOFEAN-ARIZANCU, L., GAYDARSKA, B. & MATIĆ, U. (eds.). 2021. Gender Stereotypes in Archaeology. Leiden: Sidestone Press.

COLTOFEAN-ARIZANCU, L., GAYDARSKA, B. & PLUTNIAK, S. 2020. Breaking the taboo: harassment and assault in Central-east and South-east European archaeology. Paper presented at the 26th Virtual Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists, Budapest, 24–30 August 2020. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-03287731 (last accessed on 25 May 2023).

CONKEY, M. W. & SPECTOR, J. D. 1984. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 1–38.

CUCCHIARI, S. 1981. The Gender Revolution and the Transition from Bisexual Horde to Patrilocal Band: The Origins of Gender Hierarchy, in: ORTNER, S. B. & WHITEHEAD, H. (eds.), Sexual Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31–79.

CURTA, F. & STAMATI, I. 2021. Women Archaeologists Under Communism, 1917-1989. New York: Palgrave.

DANAS 13 OCT 2022. Accessed 24 May 2023 https://www.danas.rs/vesti/politika/biljana-stojkovic-crkva-trazi-da-se-buduci-gradjani-drze-u-neznanju-upliv-u-prosvetu-protivustavan/.

DANKOVIĆ, I. 2020. Inventar grobova ženske populacije kao odraz životnog doba. Studija slučaja viminacijumskih nekropola od I do IV veka. Doktorska disertacija. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu.

DIJAZ-ANDREU, M. 2003. Identitet roda i arheologija: sintetički pregled. Genero. Časopis za feminističku teoriju i studije roda 2: 67–92.

DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. 2005. Gender identity, in: DÍAZ-ANDREU, M., LUCY, S., BABIĆ, S. & EDWARDS, D. N. (eds.), The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. London: Routledge: 13–42.

DÍAZ-ANDREU, M. & SØRENSEN, M. L. S. (eds.) 1998. Excavating Women: A history of women in European Archaeology. London: Routledge.

DIZDAR, M. (ed.). 2022. Iron Age Female Identities in the Southern Carpathian Basin. Serta Instituti Archaeologici 19. Zagreb: Institute for Archaeology

DOMMASNES, L. H., HJØRUNGDAL, T., MONTÓN-SUBÍAS, S., SÁNCHEZ ROMERO, M. & WICKER, N. L. (eds.) 2010. Situating Gender in European Archaeologies. Archaeolingua Series Minor 29. Budapest: Archaeolingua.

DOWSON, T. A. 2000. Why Queer Archaeology? An Introduction. World Archaeology 32(2): 161–165.

DOWSON, T. A. 2006. Archaeologists, Feminists, and Queers: Sexual Politics in the Construction of the Past, in: GELLER, P. L. & STOCKET, M. K. (eds.), Feminist Anthropology. Past, Present, and Future. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press: 89–102.

EAA 2020 STATEMENT ON ARCHAEOLOGY AND GENDER 27-29 April 2022. Accessed 30 May 2023 https://www.e-a-a.org/EAA/Navigation_News/2020_Statement_on_Archaeology_and_Gender.aspx

ENGELSTAD, E. 2007. Much More than Gender. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14(3): 217–234.

FAUSTO-STERLING, A. 1992. Myths of Gender. Biological Theories about Women and Men. Second Edition. New York: Basic Books.

FERJANČIĆ, S., STEFANOVIĆ, D., RADIĆ, R. & NEDELJKOVIĆ, Z. 2013. Istorija za prvi razred opšteg, društveno-jezičkog i prirodno-matematičkog smera. Beograd: Freska.

FODOR E. 2022. The Gender Regime of Anti-Liberal Hungary. New York: Palgrave Pivot.

GARAŠANIN, M. 1979. Centralnobalkanska zona, in: BENAC, A. (ed.), Praistorija jugoslovenskih zemalja II. Neolitsko doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauke I umjetnosto Bosne I Hercegovine, Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja: 79–212.

GAYDARSKA, B. ET AL. 2023. To Gender or not To Gender? Exploring Gender Variations through Time and Space. European Journal of Archaeology 28(1). doi:10.1017/eaa.2022.51

GAYDARSKA, B. & GUTSMIEDL-SCHÜMANN, D. 2024. Gender education in archaeology, in: MATIĆ U., GAYDARSKA, B., COLTOFEAN-ARIZANCU, L. & DÍAZ-GUARDAMINO, M. (eds.), Current Archaeological Debates from the Perspective of Gender Archaeology. New York: Springer, forthcoming.

GILCHRIST R. 1999. Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past. London and New York: Routledge.

GREIF, T. 2000. Arheologija spolov. Arheo. Glasilo Slovenskega arheološkega društva 20: 62–67.

GUTSMIEDL-SCHÜMANN, D., HELMBRECHT, M. & KRANZBÜHLER, J. (eds.). 2021. Feministische Perspektiven auf Gender und Archäologie. Beiträge der Tagung zum 25-jährigen Bestehen von FemArc. Frauen – Forschung – Archäologie 14. Münster: Waxmann.

GYUCHA, A., & PARKINSON, W. (eds.). 2023. First Kings of Europe. Exhibition Catalog. London: UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press and The Field Museum of Natural History.

HAYS-GILPIN, K. & WHITLEY, D. S. (eds.). 1997. Reader in Gender Archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.

HITCHCOCK, L. & NIKOLAIDOU, M. 2013. Gender in Greek and Aegean Prehistory, in: BOLGER D. (ed.), Companion to Gender Prehistory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell: 502–525.

LAZIĆ, M. 2015. Prilog tumačenju antropomorfnih terakota iz Vinče. Arhaika 3: 89–110.

LJUŠTINA, M. & DMITROVIĆ, K. 2013. Middle Bronze Age Tumular Graves in the Kablar Range, West Serbia-Gender Perceived as Physical Condition and Social Construct. Mousaios XVIII: 105–129.

IZVEŠTAJI O FEMICIDU U SRBIJI 7 SEP 2023 https://www.womenngo.org.rs/publikacije/izvestaji-o-femicidu-u-srbiji#2022-godina

JANKOVIĆ, M. 2018. Arheološke putanje i stranputice Adama Oršića. Niš: Narodni muzej Niš, Filozofski fakultet u Beogradu.

JOVANOVIĆ, V. 2014. Homoseksualnost i srpsko društvo u 19. veku, in: BLAGOJEVIĆ, J. & DIMITRIJEVIĆ, O. (eds.), Među Nama. Neispričane priče gej i lezbejskih života. Beograd: Hartefakt Fond, 41–59.

MATIĆ, U. 2010. Dupljajska kolica i tela koja nešto znače. Genero: časopis za feminističku teoriju i studije kulture 14: 129–159.

MATIĆ, U. 2012a. Egiptologija, rod i seksualnost: kritička perspektiva. Genero: časopis za feminističku teoriju i studije kulture 16: 59–82.

MATIĆ, U. 2012b. To queer or not to queer? That is the question: Sex/gender, prestige and burial no. 10 on the Mokrin necropolis. Dacia LVI: 169–185.

MATIĆ, U. 2021. Violence and Gender in Ancient Egypt. London and New York: Routledge.

MATIĆ, U. (ed.). 2022. Beautiful Bodies. Gender and Corporeal Aesthetics in the Past. Oxford: Oxbow.

MATIĆ, U. 2024. Sexuality in the systems of thought and belief in ancient Egypt, in: WIESNER-HANKS, M. E. & KUEFLER, M. (eds.), The Cambridge World History of Sexualities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.

MAURIELLO, M. & COTTINO, G. 2022. Feeding genders: Introduction. Anthropology of Food 16: 1–10.

MEDIJA CENTAR BEOGRAD 24 Nov 2022. Accessed 30 May 2023 https://mc.rs/dogadjaji/o-promenama-u-udzbenicima-biologije-za-osmi-razred-osnovne-skole-odgovor-strucnjaka-na-cenzuru-nauke/2272.

MERC, V. 2005. Spol in arheologija. Bibliometrièna analiza “Praistorije jugoslavenskih zemalja”. Arheo. Glasilo Slovenskega arheološkega društva 23: 27–34.

MERC, V. 2010. Looking behind the Dead Objects: Gender and Archaeology in Slovenia, in: DOMMASNES, L. H., HJØRUNGDAL, T., MONTÓN-SUBÍAS, S., SÁNCHEZ ROMERO, M., WICKER, N. (eds.), Situating Gender in European Archaeology. Budapest: Archaeolingua: 117–136.

MIHAJLOVIĆ, V. D. 2011. Adultery in the mirror: Roman mirror from Viminacium, myth, moral, and rite(s) of passage, in: MARICKI GAĐANSKI, K. (ed.), Antiquity and Modern World: Religion and Culture. Antiquity and Modern World Vol. 5. Beograd: Društvo za antičke studije Srbije,Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet Univerziteta, Institut za teološka istraživanja: 178–192

MIHAJLOVIĆ, V. D. 2017. Borislav Jankulov, praistorija Vojvodine i kultura secanja I: Rasiološki pristup prošlosti, in: SAMARDŽI, Ć M. (ed.), Kultura sećanja na vojvođanskom prostoru. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet: 71–99.

MIHAJLOVIĆ, V. D. 2020. Borislav Jankulov, kultura sećanja i tumačenje praistorije II: kulturni pojasi i struje u prošlosti Vojvodine, in: SAMARDŽIĆ, M. (ed.), Istorija i interpretacija. Tumači i tumačenja vojvođanske prošlosti. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet: 183–211.

MIHAJLOVIĆ, V. D. 2022. Mirrors in the funerary contexts of Moesia Superior - Roman hegemony, beauty and gender, in: MATIĆ, U. (eds.), Beautiful Bodies Gender and Corporeal Aesthetics in the Past. Oxford: Oxbow Books: 177–230.

MILENKOVIĆ, M. & ARSENIJEVIĆ, J. 2009. Figurine kao reprezentacije tela: Analiza vinčanskih figurina gradačke i pločničke faze sa teritorije kosovske, južnomoravske i srbijanske varijante. Petničke sveske 67: 327–345.

MILINKOVIĆ, M. 1998. Odeljenje za arheologiju, in: MIHALJČIĆ R. (ed.), Filozofski fakultet, 1838–1998, period 1963–1998. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet: 425–440.

MILOSAVLJEVIĆ, M. 2017. Teorijsko-metodološke osnove u delu Fanule Papazoglu: Arheološka perspektiva. Arhaika (5): 121–142.

MILOSAVLJEVIĆ, M. 2022. Od etničkog determinizma do epistemičkog optimizma: kritička istorija nedavne prošlosti srpske arheologije. Etnoarheološki problemi 17(3): 1035–1060.

MJ GETEN 17 Feb 2020. Accessed 7 Sep 2023 https://www.transserbia.org/resursi/teorija/1662-dupljajska-kolica-i-tela-koja-nesto-znace

MONTÓN-SUBÍAS, S. & MORAL, E. 2020. Gender, Feminist, and Queer Archaeologies: A Spanish Perspective, in: SMITH, C. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer: 4471–4479.

MURRAY, S. O. 1997a. The Will Not to Know: Islamic Accommodations of Male Homosexuality, in: MURRAY, S. O. & ROSCOE, W. (eds.), Islamic Homosexualities. Culture, History, and Literature. New York and London: New York University Press: 14–54.

MURRAY, S. O. 1997b. Woman-Woman Love in Islamic Societies, in: MURRAY, S. O. & ROSCOE, W. (eds.), Islamic Homosexualities. Culture, History, and Literature. New York and London: New York University Press: 97–106.

NIJE FILOZOFSKI ĆUTATI 16 Jan 2023. Accessed 30 May 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQ9NX0-I_OU&t=5039s, last accessed on 30 May 2023

NOVAKOVIĆ, P. 2021. The History of Archaeology in the Western Balkans. Ljubljana: Univerya v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta.

PALAVESTRA, A. 2011. Kulturni konteksti arheologije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

PALAVESTRA, A. 2015. Zaboravljena naučnica i dobrotvorka Herijet Bojd Hoz. Arhaika 3: 191–204.

PALAVESTRA, A. 2020. Usamljeni arheolog. Terenski metod Miloja M. Vasića. Beograd: Filozofski Fakultet, Univerziteta u Beogradu.

PALINCAȘ N. 2008. Public patriarchy in contemporary Romanian archaeology and the image of women in the Romanian Neolithic and Bronze Age. Studii de Preistorie 5: 159–170.

PALINCAȘ, N. 2010. Living for the others. Gender relations in prehistoric and contemporary archaeology of Romania, in: L. H. DOMMASNES, T. HJØRUNGDAL, S. MONTÓN-SUBÍAS, M. SÁNCHEZ ROMERO, N. WICKER (eds.), Situating Gender in European Archaeology. Budapest: Archaeolingua: 93–116.

PAPIĆ, Ž. & SKLAVICKY, L. (eds.). 2003. Anthropologija žene. Beograd: XX vek.

PENEZIĆ, K. ET AL. 2020. Stressful times for women - Increased physiological stress in Neolithic females detected in tooth cementum. Journal of Archaeological Science 122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105217.

PLEŠE, M. A. 2018. A Trojan Horse? Sappho’s poetry as the battleground of compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian emancipation. Radovi-Zavod za hrvatsku povijest 50(2): 61–102

PORČIĆ, M. 2010. Antropologija roda praistorijskih populacija – slučaj ‘pogrešno’ orijentisanih grobova na mokrinskoj nekropoli. Etnoantropološki problemi 5(1): 165–182.

PORČIĆ, M. & STEFANOVIĆ, S. 2009. Physical activity and social status in Early Bronze Age society: The Mokrin necropolis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28(3): 259–273.

RADOMAN, M. 2020. Vrednosne orijentacije srednjoškolaca u Srbiji. Istraživanje 2019. Helsinške sveske 38. Beograd: Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava u Srbiji, Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Filozofski fakultet u Beogradu.

ROBB, J. & HARRIS, O. 2018. Becoming gendered in European prehistory: Was Neolithic gender fundamentally different? American Antiquity 83(1): 128–147.

SAKSIDA, I. 1995. The Gender Revolution. Arheo. Glasilo Slovenskega arheološkega društva 15: 39–43.

SANDERS A. ET AL. 2023. Transformations in the roles of men, women, and children in the ceramic industry at Early Bronze Age Hama, Syria and contemporary sites. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 70:

SAPSFORD, T. 2022. Performing the Kinaidos. Unmanly Men in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SEMERDIJAN, E. 2015. Sexing the Hammam: Gender Crossings in the Ottoman Bathhouse, in: OZYEGIN, G. (ed.), Gender and Sexuality in Muslim Cultures. New York: Ashgate: 253–274.

SLAPŠAK, S. 2013. Zelje in spolnost: iz zgodovinske antropologije hrane: študija o kultni, ritualni in kulturni vlogi zelja. Ljubljana: Študentska založba.

SØRENSEN, M. L. S. 2000. Gender Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

SPASIĆ, M. P. & CRNOBRNJA, A. 2014. Vinčanske zdele sa protomama. Starinar LXIV: 185–203.

SREJOVIĆ D. 1979. Protoneolit-Kultura Lepenskog vira, in: BENAC, A. (ed.), Praistorija jugoslovenskih zemalja II. Neolitsko doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauke i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja: 33–79.

STEFANOVIĆ, D. 2013. A Note on the Middle Kingdom Potters. Göttinger Miszellen 238: 99–106.

STEFANOVIĆ, S. ET AL. 2019. Bone spoons for prehistoric babies: Detection of human teeth marks on the Neolithic artefacts from the site Grad-Starčevo (Serbia). PLOS ONE pone.0225713

TASIĆ N. 2007. Ritual Pottery Set from Vinča. Glasnik srpskog arheološkog društva 27: 203–210.

TASIĆ, N. 2008. Nemi svedoci jednog vremena. Figuralna umetnost Vinče, in: NIKOLIĆ, D. (ed.), Vinča. Praistorijska metropola. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Univerziteta u Beogradu: 139–164.

TEODORSKI, M. 2022. Achilles against Time: Of the Iliad, Social Networks and Gym. Anthropologija 22(1): 35–49.

TODOROVA, M. 1997. Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TOMORAD, M. (ed.). 2018. Slavne žene stare povijesti: “Životi žena u društvima staroga svijeta”. Zagreb: Hrvatski studiji.

TRINGHAM, R. 1994. Engendered places in prehistory. Gender Place and Culture. A Journal of Feminist Geography 1(2): 169–203.

TRIPKOVIĆ, A., PORČIĆ, M., & STEFANOVIĆ, S. 2017. Mothers and Figurines: Representation of Pregnancy in the Early Neolithic of Central Balkans? Arhaika 5: 79–98.

TRIPKOVIĆ, B. 2007. Domaćinstvo i prostor u kasnom neolitu. Vinčansko naselje na Banjici. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo.

TRIPKOVIĆ, B. 2013. Domaćinstvo i zajednica: Kućne i naseobinske istorije u kasnom neolitu centralnog Balkana. Beograd: Flossie fakultet, Univerziteta u Beogradu.

UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU, FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET, Odeljenje za arheologiju 31 March 2022 Accessed May 2023. https://www.f.bg.ac.rs/files/akta/ET_Kodeks_ARH_FF.pdf

UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU, FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET, Sigurno mesto. Accessed 7 Sep 2023 https://sigurnomesto.f.bg.ac.rs

UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU, FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET, Odeljenje za arheologiju, Silabusi 7 Sep 2023 https://www.f.bg.ac.rs/sr-lat/arheologija/silabusi?IDK=373

UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU, FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET, Odeljenje za arheologiju, Zaposleni. Accessed 25 May 2023 https://www.f.bg.ac.rs/sr-lat/arheologija/zaposleni_od

VUKOVIĆ, J. 2021. Žene u rimskim provincijama na tlu Srbije, in: JANKOVIĆ PIVLJANIN S. (ed.), Žene na tlu Srbije od praistorije do savremenog doba. Beograd: HeraEdu: 32–71.

VUKOVIĆ, J. 2021a. Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines. Etnoantropološki problemi 16(3): 739–759.

VUKOVIĆ, J. 2021b. Vladarke ili potlačene?: Žene u neolitu, in: JANKOVIĆ PIVLJANIN. S. (ed.), Žene na tlu Srbije od praistorije do savremenog doba. Beograd: HeraEdu: 12–29.

VUKOVIĆ, J. 2022. Kasnoneolitske figurine kao izraz društvene nejednakosti. Etnoantropološki problemi 17(3): 827–846.

VUKOVIĆ, J., IGNJATOVIĆ, M. & ŠLJIVAR, D. 2008. Svakodnevni život na obali Dunava. Zanatlije i trgovci, ribari i zemljoradnici, in: NIKOLIĆ, D. (ed.), Vinča. Praistorijska metropola. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Univerziteta u Beogradu: 121–138.

ZAHARIJEVIĆ, A. (ed.). 2008. Neko je rekao feminizam? Kako je feminizam uticao na Žene XXI veka. Beograd: Centar za ženske studije i istraživanje roda, Rekonstrukcija ženski fond.

ZAHARIJEVIĆ A. 2019. Spaljivanje u 21. veku - šta stoji iza “rodne ideologije”. Kultura 163: 28–45.

ZAHARIJEVIĆ, A. 2020. Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler. Beograd: Akademska knjiga.

ŽIŽEK, S. 1999. Liebe deinen Nächsten? Nein, Danke! Die Sackgasse des Sozialen in der Postmoderne. Berlin: Verlag Volk und Welt.

Downloads

Published

17/04/2024

How to Cite

Matić, U. (2024). Queering Serbian Archaeology: Androcentrism, Heteronormativity, Gender and the Writing of (Pre)history. Ex Novo: Journal of Archaeology, 8, 53–75. Retrieved from https://archaeopresspublishing.com/ojs/index.php/EXNOVO/article/view/2444

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.