Plus ça change? Balkan Archaeology in Search of Identity
Keywords:
Balkan archaeology, Paradigm Shift, Epistemic Norms, Knowledge Transfers, Standpoint TheoryAbstract
Over the last decades, there have been numerous attempts to remedy the perceived delay in the development of archaeology in the Balkans, in the form of conferences, workshops or edited volumes. The frequency seems to testify that the progress is yet to be achieved. Two assumptions are common for these efforts: the archaeological record from the region is rich and highly relevant from the wider European and/or Mediterranean perspective; yet, the discipline itself is permanently petrified in the state of the outdated culture-historical paradigm. This assessment presupposes that the archaeological knowledge has been advancing along a unified trajectory and that at a certain point in time the entire research community operates under the same, universally accepted paradigm. Rather than to partake in the everlasting quest of catching up with the idealized mainstream of the discipline, it may be more productive to consider the ways in which the Balkan archaeology can contribute to the rich multivocality of the discipline, with distinctive experiences of the past and present.
References
BABIĆ, S. 2009. Jezik arheologije II, ili: Kako sam preživela promenu paradigme (The Language of Archaeology II, or: How I survived the paradigm shift). Etnoantropološki problemi (Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology) 4/1: 123–132.
BABIĆ, S. 2014. Identity, Integration and Power Relations in the Study of the Iron Age, in: POPA, C. & STODDARD, S. (eds), Fingerprinting the Iron Age – Integrating South-Eastern Europe into the Debate, Oxford: Oxbow: 295–302.
BABIĆ, S. 2014b. Afterword – When Empires Collapse, in: M. A. JANKOVIĆ, V. D. MIHAJLOVIĆ & BABIĆ, S. (eds), Imperialism and Identities at the Edges of the Roman World. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 252–256.
BABIĆ, S. 2015. Theory in Archaeology, in: WRIGHT, J. D. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 1, Oxford: Elsevier: 899–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8
BABIĆ, S. 2018. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja o prošlosti (Metaarchaeology. An Essay on the Conditions of Knowledge about the Past). Belgrade: Klio
BABIĆ, S., KARL, R., MILOSAVLJEVIĆ, M., MIZOGUCHI, K., PALUDAN-MÜLLER, C., MURRAY, T., ROBB, J., SCHLANGER, N. & VANZETTI, A. 2016. What is ‘European Archaeology’? What should it be? European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 20, issue 1: 4–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2016.12
BOURDIEU, P. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity Press
CAMPANARO, D. M. 2021. Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) and Archaeology: Old Tool, New Model. European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 24, issue 3: 412–432.
CHAPMAN, R. 2003. Archaeologies of Complexity. London, New York: Routledge
CHAPMAN, R. & WYLIE, A. 2016. Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing
CURRIE, A. 2018. Rock, Bone and Ruin. An Optimist’s Guide to Historical Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
DAWDY, S. L. 2009. Millennial archaeology. Locating the discipline in the age of insecurity. Archaeological Dialogues 16(2): 131–142.
FAGAN, M. 2010. Social Construction Revisited: Epistemology and Scientific Practice. Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, No. 1: 92–116.
FOGELIN, L. 2007. Inference to the best explanation: A common and effective form of archaeological reasoning. American Antiquity 72(4): 603–625.
FULLER, S. 2015. Knowledge. The philosophical quest in history. London, New York: Routledge
GALISON, P. 2010. Trading with the Enemy, in: M. E. GORMAN (ed.), Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press: 25–52.
HARDING, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
HARRIS, O. J. T. & CIPOLLA, C. 2017. Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives. London, New York: Routledge
HODDER, I. 1982. Theoretical Archaeology. A reactionary View, in: I. HODDER (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–16.
KANG, N. 2013. Cosmopolitan Theology: Reconstituting Planetary Hospitality, Neighbor-Love, and Solidarity in an Uneven World. St. Louis: Chalice Press
KRISTIANSEN, K. 2014. Towards a New Paradigm? The Third Sceince Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology 22: 11–34.
LONGINO, H. E. 1999. Feminist Epistemology, in: J. GRECO & E. SOSA (eds), The Guide to Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell: 325–353.
LONGINO, H. E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
LUCAS, G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
LUCAS, G. 2016. The paradigm concept in archaeology. World Archaeology 49(2): 260–270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2016.1252688
MILOSAVLJEVIĆ, M. 2018. How Archaeological Communities Think? Re-thinking Ludwik Fleck’s Concept of the Thought-Collective According to the Case of Serbian Archaeology, in: ROBERTS, J., SHEPPARD, K., HANSSON, U. & TRIGG, J. (eds), Communities and knowledge production in archaeology. Manchester: Manchester University Press: 14–33.
MILOSAVLJEVIĆ, M. 2020 – Osvit arheologije. Geneza kulturno-istorijskog pristupa u arheologiji Srbije (The Dawn of Archaeology. Serbian Archaeology and the Genesis of its Culture-historical Approach). Belgrade: Dosije
OLSEN, B., SHANKS, M., WEBMOOR, T. & WITMORE, C. 2012. Archaeology – The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press
PALAVESTRA, A. & BABIĆ, S. 2016. False Analogy: Transfer of Theories and Methods in Archaeology (The Case of Serbia). European Journal of Archaeology 19(2): 316–334.
PATTERSON, T. C. 2003. Marx’s Ghost. Conversations with Archaeologists. Oxford: Berg.
PLUCCIENIK, M. 2005. Social Evolution. London: Duckworth
ROSENZWEIG, M. S. 2020. Confronting the Present: Archaeology in 2019. American Anthropologist 122(2): 284–305.
RADAKRISHNAN, R. 2003. Theory in an Uneven World. Oxford: Blackwell
THOMAS, J. 2015. Why ‘The Death of Archaeological Theory’?, in: HILLERDAL, C. & SIAPKAS, J. (eds.), Debating Archaeological Empiricism. The Ambiguity of Material Evidence. London: Routledge: 11–36.
WYLIE, A. 2000. Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the (dis)unity of science. American Antiquity 65(2): 227–237.
WYLIE, A. 2002. Thinking from Things. Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WYLIE, A. 2003. Why standpoint matters, in: R. FIGUEROA, S. G. HARDING (eds), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. London, New York: Routledge: 26–48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
