Understanding the urban space of an Arabian oasis: the residential quarter of Taymāʾ

Authors

  • Luna Watkins

Keywords:

TaymāΜ, north-west Arabia, domestic architecture, spatial analysis, space syntax

Abstract

The oasis of Taymāʾ, north-west Arabia, was an important nodal point along the ancient trading network of the Arabian Peninsula, known since the first millennium as the 'Incense Road'. Its location and function suggest a variety of influences from diverse cultural contacts visible in the archaeological record. To investigate closer the impact of such influences on the daily life of the oasis, four buildings of a Roman (second- to fourth-century AD) residential quarter of the oasis have been analysed by the application of a 'space syntax' technique. Taking into account various elements of access, movement, and distribution of space on different levels of analysis, a fuller understanding has been obtained with regard to change or continuity of the occupation of the residential quarter through time. The test run presented in this paper focuses on the common characteristics of the above-mentioned buildings, which are those of a courtyard house with a large room for the distribution of movement.

References

Bafna S. 2003. Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment & Behavior 35/1: 17–29.

Benech C. 2007. The use of ‘space syntax’ for the study of city planning and household from geophysical maps: The case of Dura-Europos (Syria). Pages 403–416 in S. Ladstätter & V. Scheibelreiter (eds), Städtisches Wohnen Im Östlichen Mittelmeerraum 4. Jh. v. Chr.–1. Jh. N. Chr. (Akten des internationalen Kolloquiums vom 24.–27. Oktober 2007 an der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.) Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Blanton R.E. 1994. Houses and households: A comparative study. (Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology). New York: Plenum Press.

Carver M.O.H. 2009. Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge.

Clarke D.L. (ed.). 1977. Spatial archaeology. London: Academic Press.

Cooper L.M. 1995. Space syntax analysis of Chacoan Great Houses. PhD thesis, University of Arizona. [Unpublished].

Dawson P.C. 2002. Space syntax analysis of central Inuit snow houses. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21/4: 464–480.

Fletcher R. 1978. Issues in the analysis of settlement space. Pages 225–240 in D. Green, C. Haselgrove & M. Spriggs (eds), Social organization and settlement: Contributions from anthropology, archaeology and geography. (British Archaeological Reports, (Supplementary) Series, 47). Oxford: Archaeopress.

Foster S.M. 1989. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: Examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity 63/238: 40–50.

Griffiths S. 2012. The use of space syntax in historical research: Current practice and future possibilities. Proceedings of the eighth International Space Syntax Symposium 8193: 1–26.

Hanson J. (ed.). 1998. Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hausleiter A. & Eichmann R. 2018. The archaeological exploration of the oasis of TaymāΜ. Pages 2–53 in A. Hausleiter, R. Eichmann & M. al-Najem (eds), TaymāΜ I — Reports 1: Archaeological research strategies, palaeoenvironment, cultural contacts. Oxford: Archaeopress.

Hietala H.J. (ed.). 1984. Intrasite spatial analysis in archaeology (New directions in archaeology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier B. 1996. Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier B. 2014. Spatial analysis and cultural information: The need for theory as well as method in space syntax analysis. Pages 19–48 in E. Paliou, U. Lieberwirth & S. Polla (eds), Spatial analysis and social spaces. Interdisciplinary approaches to the interpretation of prehistoric and historic built environments. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hillier B. & Hanson J. 2005. The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier B., Leaman A., Stansall P. & Bedford M. 1978. Space syntax. Pages 343–381 in D. Green, C. Haselgrove & M. Spriggs (eds), Social organization and settlement: Contributions from anthropology, archaeology and geography. (British Archaeological Reports, International (Supplementary) Series, 47). Oxford: Archaeopress.

Hodder I. & Orton C. 1976. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keith K. 2003. The spatial patterns of everyday life in Old Babylonian neighborhoods. Pages 56–80 in M.L. Smith (ed.), The social construction of ancient cities. Washington, DC: Smithonian Books.

Kirsan C. 2003. Detective work with a deficient sample: Syntactic analysis of the houses of conflict. Proceedings of the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium 57: 1–28.

Leach E. 1978. Does space syntax really ‘constitute the social’. Pages 385–401 in D. Green, C. Haselgrove & M. Spriggs (eds), Social organization and settlement: Contributions from anthropology, archaeology and geography. (British Archaeological Reports, International (Supplementary) Series, 47). Oxford: Archaeopress.

Letesson Q. 2009. Du phénotype au génotype: Analyse de la syntaxe spatiale en architecture minoenne (MMIIIB–MRIB). (Aegis, 2). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.

Manum B., Rusten E. & Benze P. [2017]. AGRAPH, software for drawing and calculating space syntax ‘node-graphs’ and space syntax ‘axial-maps’. Available at www.ntnu.no/ab/spacesyntax (accessed 05/07/2017).

Osman K.M. & Suliman M. 1994. The space syntax methodology: Fits and misfits. Architecture and Behavior 10/2: 189–204.

Ostwald M.J. 2011. The mathematics of spatial configuration: Revisiting, revising and critiquing justified plan graph theory. Nexus Network Journal 13/2: 445–470.

Paliou E. 2014. Introduction. Pages 1–17 in E. Paliou, U. Lieberwirth & S. Polla (eds), Spatial analysis and social spaces: Interdisciplinary approaches to the interpretation of prehistoric and historic built environments. (Topoi, 18). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Paliou E., Lieberwirth U. & Polla S. (eds). 2014. Spatial analysis and social spaces: Interdisciplinary approaches to the interpretation of prehistoric and historic built environments. (Topoi, 18). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Papaconstantinou D. 2006. Identifying domestic space in the Neolithic eastern Mediterranean: Method and theory in spatial studies. (British Archaeological Reports, International Series, 1480). Oxford: Archaeopress.

Parker R.N. & Asencio E.K. 2008. GIS and spatial analysis for the social sciences: Coding, mapping and modeling. (Contemporary Sociological Perspectives). New York: Routledge.

Rainville L. 2005. Investigating Upper Mesopotamian households using micro-archaeological techniques. (British Archaeological Reports, International Series, 1368). Oxford: Archaeopress.

Robertson E.C., Seibert J.D., Fernandez D.C. & Zender M.U. (eds). 2006. Space and spatial analysis in archaeology. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

Al-Sayed K., Turner A., Hillier B., Lida S. & Penn A. (eds). 2013. Space syntax methodology. A teaching textbook for the MSc Spatial Design: Architecture & Cities. London: Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL.

Seibert J. 2006. Introduction. Pages xiii–xxiv in E.C. Robertson (ed.), Space and spatial analysis in archaeology. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

Stadler P. 1985. Was ist ‘Spatial Analysis’ in der Archäologie. Mitteilungen Der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien (MAGW) 115: 163–168.

Starzmann M.T. 2007. Archäologie des Raumes: Soziale Praxis und kulturelle Bedeutung am Beispiel der Wohnarchitektur von Fara. Vienna: LIT Verlag.

Stöger H. 2008. Roman Ostia: Space syntax and the domestication of space. Pages 322–327 in A. Posluschny, K. Lambers & I. Herzog (eds), Layers of perception. Proceedings of the 35th international conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. (Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, 10). Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt.

Tourtet F. & Weigel F. 2015. TaymāΜ in the Nabataean Kingdom and in Provincia Arabia. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 45: 385–404.

Van Dyke R.M. 1999. Space syntax analysis at the Chacoan Outlier of Guadalupe. American Antiquity 64/3: 461–473.

Wells J.J. 2009. A space syntax analysis of Dohack and range phase villages in the American Bottom. Pages 257–273 in J. Wilkins & K. Anderson (eds), Tools of the trade: Methods, techniques and innovative approaches in archaeology. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

Wheatley D. & Gillings M. 2002. Spatial technology and archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Published

01/01/2018

How to Cite

Watkins, L. (2018). Understanding the urban space of an Arabian oasis: the residential quarter of Taymāʾ. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 48, 353–369. Retrieved from http://archaeopresspublishing.com/ojs/index.php/PSAS/article/view/1033

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.